English | Português | Français | Español | Русский | 中文 | العربية
WSIS Knowledge Communities
Remember me | Lost password

You are viewing this page as a non-logged user. Login to see the full content and functionality. Do not have an account? Click here to register to become a member of the platform.

Do mobile phones contribute more to social impact than to economic impact in developing countries?

This debate is concerned with the impact of mobile phones on development. Do they have more value in social development or in economic development? Your contribution is invited to this debate. Which do you think matters more? What do you think is happening with mobile phones in development? And what needs to be done to maximise their value?

The background paper from the moderator, David Souter sets out some of the key facts about mobile phones -especially how access and use have grown in developing countries over the years since WSIS.

Mr Rich Ling briefly describes some of the key ways in which mobile phones have had an impact on social development.

Ms Abi Jagun briefly describes some of the key ways in which mobile phones have had an impact on economic development.

Guest speakers:

  • 13/04 Jenny Aker comments from the perspective of someone who has worked on small scale economic outcomes.
  • 13/04 Ken Banks comments from the perspective of someone concerned with small scale development activity.
  • 20/04 Alison Gillwald comments on developments in Africa.
  • 20/04 Harsha da Silva comments on developments in South Asia.
  • 20/04 Roxanna Barrantes comments on mobile phone developments in Latin America.

SCROLL DOWN TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEBATE

Debate timeline: 11 April 2011 - 2 May 2011

This is an archived debate.

This debate is closed. Click here to see the summary of the debate.

Your vote

toggle view
This debate has finished. Voting is now closed.

Votes

toggle view
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 70%
No: 30%
Yes: 69%
No: 31%
Yes: 69%
No: 31%
Yes: 78%
No: 22%
Yes: 75%
No: 25%
Yes: 74%
No: 26%
Yes: 78%
No: 22%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 73%
No: 27%
Yes: 75%
No: 25%
Yes: 79%
No: 21%
Yes: 79%
No: 21%
Yes: 79%
No: 21%
Yes: 75%
No: 25%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 74%
No: 26%
Yes: 75%
No: 25%
Yes: 75%
No: 25%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
Yes: 76%
No: 24%
TotalDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7Day 8Day 9Day 10Day 11Day 12Day 13Day 14Day 15Day 16Day 17Day 18Day 19Day 20Day 21Day 22

Debate introduction

This debate is concerned with the impact of mobile phones on development.  Do they have more value in social development or in economic development?    Your contribution is invited to this debate.  ... more

Debate participants

David is managing director of the consultancy ict Development Associates. He is also a visiting professor at Strathclyde University and visiting senior fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Rich is a professor at the IT University of Copenhagen.He is the author of the soon to be published book: New Tech, New Ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion (MIT).
Researcher with academic and commercial experience in the field of ICT for development (ICT4D). Primarily interested in the impact of technology on society; in particular the ways in which mobile communications devices impact on economic development.
Jenny C. Aker is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the Fletcher School and Department of Economics at Tufts University. She is also a Non-Resident Fellow at the Center for Global Development and a member of the Advisory Board for Frontline SMS.
Ken is the founder of kiwanja.net and FrontlineSMS. He devotes himself to the application of mobile technology for positive social and environmental change in the developing world, and has spent the last 17 years working on projects in Africa.
Alison is executive director of Research ICT Africa based in Cape Town, South Africa
2011 Eisenhower Fellow Harsha de Silva is a development economist and a member of the current Parliament of Sri Lanka.
Co-author of the study "Can the poor afford mobile telephony? Evidence from Latin America"